AD&D - Gem of Seeing vs True Seeing Spell.
Today's show compares the two and talks about how the spell is better overall, but often overlooked by players.
Today's podcast suggestion is brought to you by Donald Vek! Thank you for the suggestion.
Today's podcast discusses the differences between the Gem of Seeing from the Dungeon Master’s Guide and the True Seeing spell from the Player’s Handbook and the in AD&D.
Highlights
📖 True Seeing is a 5th level cleric spell allowing perception of true forms.
🔮 The Gem of Seeing is a magic item that detects hidden things but has limitations.
👁️ True Seeing reveals secret doors, illusions, and auras of creatures.
⏳ True Seeing lasts one round per caster level; Gem requires time to scan.
⚖️ True Seeing reveals disguises, while the Gem does not.
🎲 Gem of Seeing has a 5% chance of causing hallucinations.
🙌 True Seeing is often underutilized despite its powerful effects.
Key Insights
📜 True Seeing Spell: This spell provides a comprehensive understanding of one’s surroundings, revealing true forms and hidden details, making it invaluable in encounters. It surpasses the Gem of Seeing in utility.
💎 Gem of Seeing Limitations: While useful, the Gem has restrictions such as not revealing secret doors or the true nature of creatures, which can lead to misunderstandings in gameplay.
🔍 Clarity vs. Illusion: True Seeing allows clerics to see through all forms of deception, which is crucial for strategic planning during missions and adventures.
⏲️ Scan Time: The Gem of Seeing requires significant time to analyze areas, which can be a disadvantage in fast-paced combat situations where quick decisions are essential.
🎭 Disguises: True Seeing can uncover disguises and illusions, offering a major tactical advantage against deceptive foes, while the Gem fails in this aspect.
🚫 Hallucination Risk: The risk of false perceptions when using the Gem can complicate encounters and create chaotic situations, emphasizing the need for careful use.
🧙 Underappreciated Spell: Despite its potential, True Seeing is not commonly chosen, suggesting players may overlook its strategic benefits in favor of simpler or more familiar options.
